Hunter Biden agrees to deposition, Congress strikes to contempt decision

Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, is seen as he makes a shock look at a Home Oversight Committee markup and assembly to vote on whether or not to carry Biden in contempt of Congress for failing to answer a request to testify to the Home final month, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., January 10, 2024.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

An legal professional for Hunter Biden informed two Home Republican committee chairmen Friday that he’ll adjust to subpoenas demanding his deposition in the event that they difficulty a brand new one — a reversal of his prior demand that such testimony be given at a public listening to.

The chairmen later mentioned that they might work with Biden to schedule a date for a non-public deposition as a part of an ongoing impeachment probe of his father, President Joe Biden.

However till Hunter Biden confirms that date, they may transfer forward with a plan to have the complete Home of Representatives vote late subsequent week on a decision holding him in contempt of Congress for defying prior subpoenas demanding his closed-door testimony.

“We is not going to tolerate any extra stunts or delay from Hunter Biden,” mentioned Home Oversight Chair James Comer, R-Ky., and Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, in a joint assertion.

“The American individuals is not going to tolerate, and the Home is not going to present, particular remedy for the Biden household.”

Hunter Biden’s stunning provide to seem for a non-public deposition got here two days after Comer and Jordan’s panels handed resolutions urging the Home to carry him in contempt.

Biden confirmed up on the Oversight Committee panel hours earlier than the vote, silently staring down GOP lawmakers.

If Biden had been to be present in contempt, the Division of Justice would take into account whether or not to prosecute him for failing to adjust to the prior subpoenas.

In his letter Friday, Biden’s legal professional Abbe Lowell informed Comer and Jordan these subpoenas, issued in November, had been legally invalid as a result of they got here earlier than the Home voted to formalize the impeachment inquiry.

However, “When you difficulty a new correct subpoena, now that there is a duly licensed impeachment inquiry, Mr. Biden will comply for a listening to or deposition,” Lowell wrote.

“We’ll settle for such a subpoena on Mr. Biden’s behalf.”

Lowell’s provide got here on the finish of an eight-page letter criticizing the chairman for passing contempt resolutions regardless of Biden’s insistence that he was prepared to testify in public.

“You proceeded with a contempt course of, erroneously claiming Mr. Biden was searching for ‘particular remedy,’ regardless of Mr. Comer’s repeated and public statements about witnesses’ and Mr. Biden’s skill to testify at a deposition or listening to at their selection,” Lowell wrote.

Lowell has argued {that a} public listening to would forestall Republicans from taking Biden’s testimony in personal solely to later distort or mischaracterize what he mentioned in statements to the media or elsewhere.

The legal professional informed Comer and Jordan that he was writing the letter to “make you conscious … that your subpoenas had been and are legally invalid and can’t type a authorized foundation to proceed together with your misdirected and impermissible contempt decision.”

The impeachment probe facilities on allegations that Joe Biden’s relations, with the Democratic president’s involvement, had been corruptly exploiting his political standing and energy for private monetary acquire.

The Bidens and the White Home have rejected any suggestion of “affect peddling” and have denied wrongdoing.

Hunter Biden is presently dealing with legal expenses in two federal courts.

On Thursday, he pleaded not responsible in U.S. District Court docket in Los Angeles to 9 legal counts associated to his failure to pay his earnings taxes on time. The decide in that case tentatively scheduled the trial to start June 20.

Biden beforehand pleaded not responsible in Delaware federal courtroom to expenses associated to having a handgun whereas being a drug person.

Source link

Share with your friends!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get The Latest Real Estate Tips
Straight to your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.